User talk:Dog of War (2)/Sandbox

Well, as un-Wikipedia as it is, the religion thumb thing does look quite visually appealing. I might code up a flagbox variant for religion thumbnails. — NecrusIV (talk) 03:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

There'll definitely be Vilakismus-influenced movements across the globe after 1904, albeit adapted to the material conditions of each nation it manifests in (I can see it fitting in well with the modern Astralist liberalism adopted by non-Orthodox sects and any others opposed to the super conservative Orthodox church; especially in Sine Weythern, Etruarand and the Sinana nations). Lukanov would rise to become something of a Mao Zeodong and would be adored, quoted and followed across the globe. With the defeat of anarchism everywhere, a failure of reformism, and Marxism basically not existing in any meaningful centralised sense, more and more people disenfranchised with the system would look to Vilakusmus Variyako for inspiration. — NecrusIV (talk) 04:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, that could work. Of course all criticism of the Vilakismus will result in lefties blaming Jugčević as not a real communist Vilakismusi whilst the right will see his economic reforms as a blueprint (similar how they saw the economic restructuring experiment in Chile under Pinochet as a success). --Dog of War (2) (talk) 16:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Good to see you editing again, Dog. — NecrusIV (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I thought this was a one man website --Khalael (talk) 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm not saying a trip to East Berlin inspired me to write about authoritarian revolutionary movements, but that may be why i'm editing again. --Dog of War (2) (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Lukanov, what a guy! — NecrusIV (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)